Oh great...
I can tell I'm not going to make it out of this one

.
Obviously, the "ideal" way to hit a no leakage draw is going to depend on the individual. But, GENERALLY speaking (as I understand it, please correct me if I'm wrong), more roll = less chance of leakage, and more roll = more draw inducing. So theoretically speaking, you'd want as much roll as you can without hooking (that would cause compression leakage).
Of course, you can hit marbled draws, full-rolled fades, and anything in between. If you play a fade 90 percent of the time with a "marble" swivel, then adjusting something else to hit a draw once and a while makes sense.
However, I just don't see any advantage in "fighting" what you're trying to do. In Tiger's case (again, just as I understand it), why would you try and anti-hook your swing (with five things according to one of Brian's posts), and try and hit a bunch of draws? I'd say pick one side of the course and get rid of it.
However, he obviously can make it work

.