January '04 - May the FORCES be with you!

Status
Not open for further replies.
quote:Originally posted by horton

Yes wonderful article ..... brianman, do you believe that it is humanly possible within a rotatory golfswing to geometrically achieve a Straight Line Power Package Delivery Path (10-23-A)?

How is this anatomically possible?
In the Geometry of the Circle the only thing that is not a straight
line is the circumference (Clubhead). Everything else is straight -chords,
tangents, radius, diameter, and planes.(Hands) There must be a constant
center and a constant radius.(left shoulder and Left Arm) The proper geometrical relationship of the circle to the line (The Three Imperatives) must be established to produce a workable procedure for applying a circular force (clubhead path) to a ball so as to produce the same reaction as that produced by a linear force. (Line of Compression)

Horton, first, I had a paying job for you to re-write the science of the golf swing. You disappeared- shame on you. Chicken or what? It would be a challenge for you.

Second- as I stated before. Your Geometry for your single axis- JK golf swing is applied differently then the science of Geometry we use in a convention swing. It is like arguing about apples and oranges. And only a loon would press on arguing a point that doesn’t exist with the other.
 
Please 6bee, I asked Brian, who possess a GSED to respond to my query .... unless you are Brian in drag. [:0]
 
quote:Originally posted by horton

Please 6bee, I asked Brian, who possess a GSED to respond to my query .... unless you are Brian in drag. [:0]
First- You would be the last person to tell me not to post. Loosen the bra straps Horton and enjoy the forum. I have answered your questions and you hide from them.

Second - Horton, I offered you a chance to write a constructive revision of Homer's science for a fee and have it published. I guess the challenge is too much for you. Email me if you are up to it and we can discuss the fee.

One last point about your SA/Jack K golf swing- it was born out of weakness. Even you have said a SA swing is for someone like you, stout and unflexible. It could never reach full prefection as a convention swing, certainly not a TGM trained swing. Building a swing for old and/or fat guys is not perfection. And once again you are arguing two different applications of science. Your queer (as in odd) physics and Homers basic Geometry of Lines and Planes.
 
quote:Originally posted by brianman

Straight line...no.

But straight-er yes.

Thanks brainman ..... but this only creates other conundrums.

The Hand Path apparently starts on a curved path, attempts to get "straight-er", and then somehow returns to a curved path. The force necessary to alter the momentum developed by the body, arms and club would be tremendous and really not scientifically nor intuitively conceivable to do this.

So I respectfully ask you, how do you make the Hand Path go straight-er in the middle of the golfswing and maintain it almost to final Release as illustrated in TGM? And then, how is it possible to return to a normal curved Hand Path after maintaining a straight-er path?

What body forces must be applied to accomplish this feat? Do you see any problem with this golfswing concept?
 
quote:Originally posted by brianman

First of all...do you realize what a CIRCLE delivery path is??
Not really, Brian .... please explain what a CIRCLE Delivery Path is and how it affects the Downswing from the Top, and also reading references in TGM. Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top