Lever Assemblies ..........

Status
Not open for further replies.
quote:Originally posted by 6bee1dee The left shoulder is the fulcrum in the golf swing firmly grounded in your GRF's and clean cleats, no? That is what you said in the other post, GRF's pressing downward into the ground. That is not firm?

The shoulder joint is the pivot point at the top of the fulcrum, which is then anchored into the ground through the body and feet ... maybe ....
 
quote:Originally posted by horton

quote:Originally posted by 6bee1dee The left shoulder is the fulcrum in the golf swing firmly grounded in your GRF's and clean cleats, no? That is what you said in the other post, GRF's pressing downward into the ground. That is not firm?

The shoulder joint is the pivot point at the top of the fulcrum, which is then anchored into the ground through the body and feet ... maybe ....


Maybe? I think yes. You use a single or no levers on the left arm which fine with a natural golf, a single axis swing- what ever it is you do- if you do. But you cannot carry those limited parameters in the swing we use. Kind of like bitching about highway traffic to a pilot 30,000 feet in the air.
 
Horton,

Please stop it. You are embarising yourself. When you come to the forum for a battle of wits you are arriving unarmed.

Science is knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through the scientific method. Such knowledge or such a system of knowledge is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena. The actual employment of this scientific knowlege in practical use is called engineering. Homer is practicing engineering as he uses these natural truths to describe the practical world. The label that you use for a specific truth means nothing the actual truth and its employ in the everyday world is what is important.

Ooops! I just violated one of my major rules .... "Do not, ever, respond to a twit".
 
quote:Originally posted by MizunoJoe

fen

Indeed, and your reaction is exactly why he said it! Seeing as how mandrin really DOES believe that, and there being only .0000045 chance that there could be even ONE person on spaceship earth so disconnected from reality, it follows that horton DOES NOT believe it.

To be honest - I still think what hortson said was funny. :)

To be honest - twice in a row - I only replied w/ a quote becauce I think this one's a keeper. Now there's no way Peter/as/horton is going to edit this - the "good stuff" - out.

I know it's bad form to feed the trolls - but hortson really should get his string of five - maybe just not stars?

Bunnyrabbits, maybe?


fen "Too much eggnog? - No way, hortson was born this way"


P.S. What exactly goes to American eggnog - besides lithium and prosac?:)
 
quote:Originally posted by MizunoJoe

fdb2,

Peter, mandrin, and horton are distinct individuals. Peter has not posted here.

MizunoJoe,

Do you know something we don't?

I'd vote w/ fdb2 on this one. Peter has a tendency to use same kind of science babble as horton. And the handle he uses, horton, is probably just some oddball comeback to Don Horton - a real person.

As to mandrin, I'd give you better than even odds its Peter.

Of cause - if somebody comes out with the revelation that mandrin is Peters not-so-bright kidbrother - I won't be too surprised.


fen
 
fen,

I've been to the SA enough in the last 3-4 yrs to even imagine what they look like - (not necessary for Peter, who posts shirtless photos of himself). mandrin is well described by you as a propeller-beanied, baggie pants nerd with a shirt pocket full of pens and a slide rule hanging from his belt.

horton, on the other hand, has steady work as BOBO the clown with various carnivals in the Fall season. You know, the one who sits on a lever activated plank, which, when tripped by throwing a ball at a target, dumps BOBO into a tank of water. BOBO taunts and insults(debates) onlookers into buying 3 balls for a buck.
 

fdb2

New
quote:Originally posted by Fenring

quote:Originally posted by MizunoJoe

fdb2,

Peter, mandrin, and horton are distinct individuals. Peter has not posted here.

MizunoJoe,

Do you know something we don't?





I'd vote w/ fdb2 on this one. Peter has a tendency to use same kind of science babble as horton. And the handle he uses, horton, is probably just some oddball comeback to Don Horton - a real person.

As to mandrin, I'd give you better than even odds its Peter.

Of cause - if somebody comes out with the revelation that mandrin is Peters not-so-bright kidbrother - I won't be too surprised.


fen

Mandrin is of course Mandrin. I can recognize his hyperinflated style and "put-me-down" replies. I thought that Horton was Peter Dillard at first and maybe he was but now I believe that Horton's log-in was given to Mandrin and Mandrin can play off of himself at your expense and time. Ignore them both they thrive on this.

Another individual on the DG aptly put things in perspective by saying: Don't argue with a pig. You'll only get muddy and the pig loves it.
 
fdb2,

Very interesting that you mention the pig analogy, and then proceed to go mud wrestling in the two threads above this one!

You advise, "Ignore them both" (horton and mandrin). So just why is it that you don't take your own advice?????
 
I noticed Sci-golf doesn't have a forum? Interesting? No dissenters that way. No shortages of contraptions you can buy for three easy payments, plenty of secure credit card connections. Maybe, Psy - golf would have ben more apropriate?
 

fdb2

New
quote:Originally posted by MizunoJoe

fdb2,

Very interesting that you mention the pig analogy, and then proceed to go mud wrestling in the two threads above this one!

You advise, "Ignore them both" (horton and mandrin). So just why is it that you don't take your own advice?????


You're ABSOLUTELY right. Won't argue with them again. Neither will I give out any opinions on your posts. Fair enough?
 
quote:Originally posted by fdb2

quote:Originally posted by MizunoJoe

fdb2,

Very interesting that you mention the pig analogy, and then proceed to go mud wrestling in the two threads above this one!

You advise, "Ignore them both" (horton and mandrin). So just why is it that you don't take your own advice?????


You're ABSOLUTELY right. Won't argue with them again. Neither will I give out any opinions on your posts. Fair enough?


Relax guys.

No need to get too worked-up over a second-rate troll.


fen
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top