This is great "theory" discussion...
What I take from the discussion so far is that:
Homer teaches hands controlled pivot (Great)
Some of you believe that pivot controlled hands is inferior because (Homer teaches something else, to which I do not care...if it works it works, its about the score)
Some of you believe pivot controlled hands leads to wild shots (I have gained MORE control over my ball flight using this procedure, AND, I do not see how it could lead to wild shots...When ball position is correct, its a thing of beauty)
Some of you believe that you do not get good distance....Thats simply NOT true. This procedure is the ultimate in lag and compression...I really compress the s_it out of the ball...better than I ever have...what can be wrong about that?
I hit the ball much more on line, and I can draw and fade it....
As Brian has alluded to, it does not lead to back problems..(no reverse C, etc...its simply rotation which is NOT intrusive to the back)
So, beyond the theory stuff, and the fact that Homer doesnt teach it, this discussion has
not</u> convinced me that its inferior, especially for short irons (nor do I believe you have convinced yourselves...Its just regergatate the book with no other basis of thought or proof...in my line of work, that "logic" does not hold water)
I guess I am one who is willing to do something that Homer does not go out of his way to teach (by the way, how in the h_ll do YOU KNOW that Homer is 1)right about EVERYTHING, and 2) Provides the only way to strike the ball well
. You guys have only convinced me that the Book teaches something else, and it does not say that this procedure is ineffective</u>.....Travino, Sutton, Azinger, Duval, Pohl, Quiqely, etc.