^^^ Interesting comment, islandgolf ... but which pictures are those?? You know that GRF's are invisible to the naked eye ....
The actual forces are invisible but do they leave or cause visible effects?
^^^ Interesting comment, islandgolf ... but which pictures are those?? You know that GRF's are invisible to the naked eye ....
The actual forces are invisible but do they leave or cause visible effects?
Yes they do, grasshopper ... they make you swine faster ...
SteveT, yes, I am very aware GRF's are invisible to the naked eye, unless of course something else makes them visible that can easily be seen on Americans but not Europeans.
Yes, yes, Dariusz .... but the horizontal and vertical forces are only the components of the Resultant Force. Try explaining the vectorial resolution of GRF's to those who only look at superficial pictures of golfswings and gossip non-stop about videos.
They see pictures .. I see forces ... that's like kindergarten golf versus scientific golf ... ya think ...??!!!!
i like what dariusz has to say, about standing on ice and losing friction,,,
same thing if we stand on a spongy material.
but i thought this whole ground force concept is rather intuitive. it has been working on us from the moment we stepped feet on the ground...
Excellent stuff! I missed it the first time through, but seems clear as a bell.
Should we go back to metal spikes?
Excellent stuff! I missed it the first time through, but seems clear as a bell.
Should we go back to metal spikes?
I guessed right.
"There was no significant difference between the metal and alternative spike shoes for any torque measure (p > 0.05), ..................."
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2008) 7, 408-414
wulsy,Hi madarin
I couldn't understand your analysis fully.
Are the GFs only responsible for increasing angular momentum in the wrists/club? Or alternatively, are they in addition to this a reactive force which is dependent on the accumulation of other torques in the body?
Thanks