Please re-read my post. I said the win at BH was against a better contention of players. Meaning the players in contention were better then than yesterday. You don't agree?
It also means that to win the event, you have to play better than the guys in contention. If the guys in contention are used to winning and/or are major champions, would that not be a tougher get than over taking a guy(s) who has yet to collect a single trophy?
When Rock won in the dessert, was it not more impressive because he did it while Tiger was standing next to him? Or would it have been equally impressive if Levin was standing next to him?
Come on, mgranato. At Bay Hill, Tiger started Sunday with a one-shot lead. At the Memorial, Tiger started Sunday four shots behind the lead. Memorial was a lot more impressive.