quote:Originally posted by David Alford
Greg, see? Matthew takes a statement out of context from weeks ago in another thread in a different forum, with yet another personal attack that is a mini essay on how worthless I am as a human being.
The conclusion, "HK is just plain wrong!", was not a stand alone comment. It was a summation following a slew of posts citing specifically why I thought he was wrong. See the thread on HK's analysis of Bobby Clampett's swing for the 7 SPECIFIC reasons.
This proves again the point, no post will be well received here if it disagrees with HK or TGM unless submitted with maximum reverance to the guru gods here.
My criticism of HK's analysis of Clampett's swing and my observation TGM could have and should have been written more clearly have produced HUNDREDS of posts and innumberable personal attacks thrown at me. Make a lot of sense? Not to me.
Ironically when people inquire, they find I don't have other criticisms of TGM. Above, I have given HK some credit for good thinking. Does Matthew take note of that and say "hey, the guy complimented HK and said he doesn't have any major criticisms of TGM?". No. He goes hunting around to find another bone to contend so he can launch yet another personal attack.
And this is after I suggested trying an experiment. Namely, stop the personal attacks and see what happens. That olive branch was thrown right back at me.
And now, Brian, growing tired of a modicum of good will in recent days, wants me to post on a subject where he thinks I will founder so he can pounce and rip into me.
Same-O, Same-O, around the world. Defend that belief system!
