Brian Manzella
Administrator
Cool
Brian: On the FGI swing discussion section there was a post on Mickelson's swing defects, I know you had an opinion on this but never alluded to what it was. I guess for professional reasons which is fair enough. In the right hands how long do you think it would take to fix him? Also is there any chance of finding out what his defect/defects is/are? Thanks.quote:Originally posted by brianman
1 session, maybe 2 hours, and I would have him hitting it (and understanding it) so good, he might not lose for a while.
He really doesn't know what he is doing. He is very smart and would take the infomation, the RIGHT information, and be even better.
He won't get it from the "Trobleshooters".
EVERY shot was a draw.quote:Originally posted by hue
I watched him when I was working for ABC at the Open and most of the shots I saw him hit were straight with a slight fade. Cherrybarry: Was he drawing the ball or hitting it straight when you were watching him? Brian : Do you prefer your players to draw or fade the ball?
quote:Originally posted by cherrybarry
EVERY shot was a draw.quote:Originally posted by hue
I watched him when I was working for ABC at the Open and most of the shots I saw him hit were straight with a slight fade. Cherrybarry: Was he drawing the ball or hitting it straight when you were watching him? Brian : Do you prefer your players to draw or fade the ball?
If he was working on that shot, one would expect him to hit a couple of fades in between, but every one of them was a draw.
Thanksquote:Originally posted by redan
If he was working on a draw, why would he hits fades in between?
Johnny Miller said he hit three draws three fades three straight when he was practicing. That it kept draws from turning into hooks and fades into slices, that he tried not to overcook anything when he was on the range...
Couples swings in-out with an open face to fade it. So does Vijay. And Furyk doesn't fade it anymore.quoteuval, Couples, Toms, Furyk fade
Brian, i think its the first time i hear you say this....about time...personnaly i thought you were a crazed powerego that just wants to be #1 instructor, i still think this is your goal and that you are, but nice to know that the real devotion is still "getting people better", your forum is pretty cool...quote:Originally posted by brianman
quote:Originally posted by ecox3
It's very obvious that NONE of you play to a level that could actually place in a Professional level tournament. Tiger is not "in" enough for what? Scott Hoch "carries" the club too much to eliminate him from what? WHAT? WHAT? WHAT?
You don't GET IT!
He (and you and me) can be BETTER!!!!
I have devoted my entire professional life to getting people better.
Get it?