Writing all the time about how great Moe Norman was is starting to get ridiculous. He was clearly a great ball-striker but non stop speculation about who was the best is pointless. I have heard some great stories about Moe Norman and also some who said he hit it nowhere. He is well renowned despite not winning on Tour, so that is enough.
Personally I don't think any one of the players mentioned constantly would stand out, but there's only one Hogan. Let's look at golf as a whole and not just Trevino, Moe Norman, Hogan or Sadlowski or whoever is the flavour of the month. A bit more imaginative posts wouldn't go amiss.
Personally I don't think any one of the players mentioned constantly would stand out, but there's only one Hogan. Let's look at golf as a whole and not just Trevino, Moe Norman, Hogan or Sadlowski or whoever is the flavour of the month. A bit more imaginative posts wouldn't go amiss.