What's Hogan saying???

Status
Not open for further replies.

66er

New
Knowing how is just part of it and is not really that important to a player to know all the tiny scientific details. There's not one good or great player out there now on any Tour and in the past that knows as much as Steve T about the science but they all can whoop his ass, how is that possible he knows more.

On a conscious level yeah, but these guys have a much deeper understanding of these concepts, which arent confined to graphs and calculations. But graphs and calculations can be used to help those who dont have this understanding.
 

footwedge

New member
On a conscious level yeah, but these guys have a much deeper understanding of these concepts, which arent confined to graphs and calculations. But graphs and calculations can be used to help those who dont have this understanding.



I understand. Somehow I can't do...lol.
 

Dariusz J.

New member
Nesbit had 50 more years of empirical data, 84 subjects, a variable full-body computer model and a multi-camera motion analysis system.

Hogan had a slab of turf, some forged blades, a bucket of range balls, and legs he could hardly walk with. I think Hogan did pretty well with his project.

Not a word more, not a word less.

Cheers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top