I know it's too late to keep Hank, and I'm certainly not saying that Hank is the greatest teacher of all time, but I think there was something far more obvious and overlooked that was the root of Tiger's woes.
When I look at Tiger's success in driving pre-Nike and post-Nike, it's irrefutable. Something significant happened to his driving ability.
Year / Percentage / Rank
1997 - 68.62 - 97
1998 - 67.88 - 116
1999 - 71.31 - 65
2000 - 71.22 - 54
2001 - 65.48 - 145
Switched to Nike Driver
2002 - 67.52 - 107
2003 - 62.71 - 142
2004 - 56.13 - 182
2005 - 54.58 - 191
2006 - 60.71 - 139
2007 - 59.82 - 152
2008 - No data
2009 - 64.29 - 83
So, the worst percentage he had with the Titleist was 65.48. Only 1 time with the Nike was his percentage any better than his WORST with the Titleist. Let me say that again.. His WORST YEAR with the Titleist was better than every year with the Nike except 1. Don't forget that also during that 2002 year he put the Titleist driver back in. Nike was throwing fits when he did.
Tiger made the switch to Hank in 2004. One could argue that Tigers numbers were going down before he started with Hank and his number have slowly crept up since working with Hank.
Everyone wants to point to Hank (and I'm not an HH fan either) but the glaringly obvious is overlooked even more because of the very same thing you probably do. You just cannot believe what the facts tell you. It seems unimaginable that the worlds greatest golfer is inflicted with just the wrong club in his hands. Afterall, aren't the greatest players supposed to be able to swing anything? But it is all there for everyone to see. Yes, equipment DOES matter.
When I look at Tiger's success in driving pre-Nike and post-Nike, it's irrefutable. Something significant happened to his driving ability.
Year / Percentage / Rank
1997 - 68.62 - 97
1998 - 67.88 - 116
1999 - 71.31 - 65
2000 - 71.22 - 54
2001 - 65.48 - 145
Switched to Nike Driver
2002 - 67.52 - 107
2003 - 62.71 - 142
2004 - 56.13 - 182
2005 - 54.58 - 191
2006 - 60.71 - 139
2007 - 59.82 - 152
2008 - No data
2009 - 64.29 - 83
So, the worst percentage he had with the Titleist was 65.48. Only 1 time with the Nike was his percentage any better than his WORST with the Titleist. Let me say that again.. His WORST YEAR with the Titleist was better than every year with the Nike except 1. Don't forget that also during that 2002 year he put the Titleist driver back in. Nike was throwing fits when he did.
Tiger made the switch to Hank in 2004. One could argue that Tigers numbers were going down before he started with Hank and his number have slowly crept up since working with Hank.
Everyone wants to point to Hank (and I'm not an HH fan either) but the glaringly obvious is overlooked even more because of the very same thing you probably do. You just cannot believe what the facts tell you. It seems unimaginable that the worlds greatest golfer is inflicted with just the wrong club in his hands. Afterall, aren't the greatest players supposed to be able to swing anything? But it is all there for everyone to see. Yes, equipment DOES matter.