This just isn't helpful. No one is having a contest on how well we "know TGM." We're trying to have a productive conversation about the fundamentals of the golf swing.
Trust me, my post is right on the money.
Thanks for providing your understanding of the TGM definition. But could you please translate it into a language that more of us can understand? To wit:
I know this is just a small thing but when you say 'your understanding of the TGM definition' it basically says that I could be in error in a subtle pejorative manner which subsequently means your a hypocrit when at the end of the post when you say...
Your post, instead, seems much more intent on making you look clever than on helping out either the OP or anyone else understand or improve the golf swing.
Awfully sorry to break your bubble but I actually can read and comprehend extremely well.
what is the "whole primary lever assembly"? Does it differ from part of the "primary lever assembly"?
The primary lever assembly is the left arm and club.
The secondary lever assembly is the club.
WHAT relation does it need to form to the inclined plane? I don't see how plane angle has anything to do with this, but please explain how it does.
[/LIST]
I mentioned the inclined plane, I never mentioned plane angle. Its true that the inclined plane is always on an angle but by using this term it means that the degree of the angle is somehow important and I just don't see what the specific plane angle has in terms of pertinence to the discussion at hand.
Anyways answering the question, the inclined plane is needed for a definition to be correct.
For the intelligent people:
The club will always stay on the inclined plane. The hand always being on the club means that it will always be on the inclined plane (not quite true due to the LCOG but close enough for our purposes here).
But if we are to define a point in relation to the left arm which the clubhead passes with the hands act as 'a center' and the left arm is above this inclined plane you have to specific about this geometrical relationship by inscribing it from a vertical plane relationship (not to be confused with the inclined plane) using the two points from the left shoulder to the left wrist and the inclined plane itself. When the clubhead passes that vertical plane relationship with the inclined plane and the left arm prior to impact then you are flipping.
For the dumb people:
"Are you simply saying that flipping occurs when the clubshaft reaches a position fully in-line with the left arm prior to impact?"
What your saying is wrong because what your saying is the left arm and clubshaft go into one single line in relation to each other at one point in the stroke which would be pretty retarded. There is a line but you need the reference of the inclined plane to define it.
However as a teletubby description to get people on the rough idea of the topic it might work.
So at this point you haven't shown me, or anyone else, how Richie3Jack is confused about the meaning of "flipping."
I have but you just don't know it.
No. "Both players need work" is not a critique. It is a comment, a statement of opinion, perhaps even an aspersion.
An aspersion is kinda like slandering which doesn't really make any sence, perhaps you mean't assertion.
Anyways ....
However, I can use the word 'critique' in terms of my overall assessment of the two golf strokes. I don't have to tell you what leads me to that conclusion in order for me to offer it.
Don't try to outsmart me, im too quick for you...
And again using words that you don't really know shows you to being hypocritical when saying
Your post, instead, seems much more intent on making you look clever than on helping out either the OP or anyone else understand or improve the golf swing.
Yikes...
set of detailed explanations for what you see happening in the golf swing, what you see as wrong what is currently happening, how you would go about changing it, and what positive effects you think that change would create. Richie3Jack has provided a critique that contains all these elements. Jim, myself, and many others have discussed and modified that critique.
Really?
Ok, lets take them one at a time.
Detailed explanations - Flip, No Flip, Flip, No Flip... yup thats really detailed explanation especially when you consider that the pictures provided were taken after the event which would of proved it and as such illustrated nothing.
If flipping were a crime and I was his lawyer. Whether he did flip or not, he would get off on reasonable doubt...
How you would go about changing it + what positive effects you think that change would create - Yeah 'flip, no flip, flip, no flip' that explains everything on how to change things and what positive effects it gives. I mean yeah, how could I not see that before...