Yes, thank you for pointing out my gaffe.
You're welcome.
Yes, thank you for pointing out my gaffe.
Please show us Quiros' "laying off" in the DTL video provided by spmurph at his message #7. What did I miss?
As for "toss out", just look at Quiros' transition from the top. It's tight within his 7/8ths backswing.
Could you define "toss out"?
Could you define "toss out"?
Perfect example
What confuses me is how from a face on view the club appears to be behind the head when the left arm is parallel to the ground but, if it is being laid off/flattened a lot, you would think it would "disappear" behind the golfer?
From face on, the clubhead laying off or tumbling makes it go away from or toward the camera. Not disappearing or appearing from behind the golfer. That would be an increase or decrease of the angle in the left wrist.
Kevin, would you say he seems to tumble really late?
It's pretty difficult for me to "fit it all in".
I don't like the word tumble. There's a point where the trailing clubhead passes the
hands in the downswing and gets closer to the target line. In a good golf swing that
usually takes place in the area where the shaft approaches a parallel position to the
ground. To me, it's not a sudden falling and it can be pinpointed with precision if you
know what you're doing.
I too have a problem with the generalized term "tumble". True Temper ShaftLab measured toe-up and toe-down positions within the downswing shaft loading profile, and this defines the type and rate of "tumble". Unfortunately, TT have discontinued ShaftLab but the base knowledge is still valid.
TT ShaftLab identified three basic shaft loading profiles -- double peak, single peak and ramp-up. There can even be hybrid profiles.
Tutelman explains the TT ShaftLab factors here:
Link: Lessons from ShaftLab
Have you determined your downswing shaft loading profile, and if yes, what is it?
It's best to stick with topics you know something about. Tumbling, as it is referred to in instruction, has nothing to do with shaft loading profiles.
Nothing.
I am glad you brought this up Mike. I cannot fit it all in unless my hands go way high (reach for the sky). But then that is not where I put them because I cannot get the clubhead back to the ball with any consistency. Lower hands at transition = more consistency.
I am not sure in all the teaching here that this high hands question has been adequately discussed. For example, if you cannot or will not lift your arms and hands high what is really possible in hand path and torque application? And what is futile?
Maddening how just a few more inches of elevation of the hands/arms can completely unhinge a consistent swing. But then when you occasionally connect from the high position you immediately understand how much more power is available from there.