what if we extended this hypothesis to include Trackman?
I vote strongly for golfers would be better.
Too many crazy ideas made their way into golf teaching JUST BECAUSE they "looked good on video" and had NO BASIS for being other than someone's opinion.
Scores go down with TrackMan, up with video.
Here's my thought and I'd like to have yours: the technology is only as good as the user. TRACKMAN has taught us a ton about impact and resulting ball flight. But at some point a human being has to make corrections, and then the student, complete with old habits, learning styles, personality, and all their personal baggage, has to be communicated with, corrected. It is then in the hands of teacher. Completely. So the machine did it's job, now what? At that point the teacher has an arsenal of fixes at his/ her disposal OR NOT. I watched a guy at a demo day recently who had not a clue what to do with 8 degree inside out hooks except to stiffen the shaft and add loft!!!
I do not know what would have happened starting from 1985 but I know what old Hogan once said. He said if he had got video camera back then he would have literally killed them all on the course. Since he was pretty damn good at killing them all without video camera I presume he knew what he talked about.
Cheers
Obviously was not possible in the 30-ies or 40-ies or 50-ies. Do you think they had video cameras in the modern sense these days ? Besides, I am not imagining things, I am quoting more or less what the man said.
Cheers
If it is just you and me, we KILL 'em.
side note - Dariusz, that's gotta be a record setting threadjack - post #3
less than five minutes late or your record could've stood forever.
Have you seen the Bobby Jones instructional series D? Surely Ben could have done the same.
[Imagine Hogan playing with a Pro-V1 ball!! Might not have missed a green.
Or Phil using a balata might not hit the planet