Lexi Thompson

Status
Not open for further replies.

natep

New
I watched her hit balls on the range at the Women's US Open this year. She was the longest of anybody else I saw, and very accurate. She would hit 20-30 balls at each target green and didnt start missing any until she was hitting at the green about 215 out. She was driving it almost 300 I'd say.
 
It wouldnt do a thing for ratings....IMO

I don't quite get what you're saying. You don't think the tour's biggest problem (besides the weak economy) is the fact that it's dominated by foreign players who tend to have trouble speaking English? If an American phenom like Lexi winning a lot of tournaments wouldn't help then what would?

P.S.: Yes, I recognize that it would help if Lexi were more physically attractive but still.....
 
When the tour was dominated by American/English speaking players, what was the reason it struggled? The answer should be the same.
 

Kevin Shields

Super Moderator
I don't quite get what you're saying. You don't think the tour's biggest problem (besides the weak economy) is the fact that it's dominated by foreign players who tend to have trouble speaking English? If an American phenom like Lexi winning a lot of tournaments wouldn't help then what would?

P.S.: Yes, I recognize that it would help if Lexi were more physically attractive but still.....

Not at all, the LPGAs biggest problem is the L. It doesnt matter where they are from. KJ Choi and Ryo Ishikawa and Jumbo Ozaki, etc were are and were big stars when they played here. It doesnt matter what they do.
 
When the tour was dominated by American/English speaking players, what was the reason it struggled? The answer should be the same.

I think the sexuality had something to do with that as well. I don't care, but I do believe sponsors and other viewers have a problem with it.

The women's tennis tour does quite well and that is the model I would follow for the LPGA.






3JACK
 
The Tennis model is that they play the same events with the men. We really don't know how well they would do on their own. What part of the Tennis model are you suggesting they follow? I don't see the men reducing their field sizes to allow the women to play with them.
 
I think the sexuality had something to do with that as well. I don't care, but I do believe sponsors and other viewers have a problem with it.

The women's tennis tour does quite well and that is the model I would follow for the LPGA.

3JACK

On sexuality, the country's views have rapidly become more tolerant over time. Yet the LPGA Tour doesn't seem to have become more popular over that same time period. Not sure the sexuality issue is as huge as y'all make it out to be.
 

dbl

New
Tough side topic here, but imo the discussion was about the tour in general, not Lexi. Anyway, back in the late 90's a friend of mine was close with some the businesses that sponsored PGA Tour events and they wouldn't touch the LPGA due to the L issue. If the product is horrible and they don't want to say that was the reason, why would they bother blaming this other factor? So I agree with other people regarding the importance of this factor for the reticence of potential sponsors.

In my own mind, it was a little uncomfortable to have some Top 10 players converting the straight ones. Also the tour run daycare for the adopted kids of L couples is also a bit unnerving; I'm not sure why the tour "bragged on this" with publicity, but I guess parts of the organization are proud to meet the needs of players. Not sure I know the right thing, but nonetheless sponsors are thus basically paying for all kinds of things they may not want to be.

I figure until they get a Tiger Woods equivalent, they will go along as they are.
 
Last edited:
Tough side topic here, but imo the discussion was about the tour in general, not Lexi. Anyway, back in the late 90's a friend of mine was close with some the businesses that sponsored PGA Tour events and they wouldn't touch the LPGA due to the L issue. If the product is horrible and they don't want to say that was the reason, why would they bother blaming this other factor? So I agree with other people regarding the importance of this factor for the reticence of potential sponsors.

In my own mind, it was a little uncomfortable to have some Top 10 players converting the straight ones. Also the tour run daycare for the adopted kids of L couples is also a bit unnerving; I'm not sure why the tour "bragged on this" with publicity, but I guess parts of the organization are proud to meet the needs of players. Not sure I know the right thing, but nonetheless sponsors are thus basically paying for all kinds of things they may not want to be.

I figure until they get a Tiger Woods equivalent, they will go along as they are.

I would think that within a few years, potential sponsors will increasingly want to project a tolerant image.
 
The Tennis model is that they play the same events with the men. We really don't know how well they would do on their own. What part of the Tennis model are you suggesting they follow? I don't see the men reducing their field sizes to allow the women to play with them.

If I'm not mistaken, the women only play a couple events a year with the men (the majors and couple others). But they play in countries all over the world, which represent their market and membership. If they played the heavy majority of there events here in the States, it would be dying on the vine as well.
 
I would think that within a few years, potential sponsors will increasingly want to project a tolerant image.

Sponsors want to project their product above anything. The LPGA doesn't draw enough eyeballs, tolerant or otherwise.

The problem might be they are in direct competition with a far superior product in the same market. It's like saying, "Why isn't RC Cola doing better with their fresh new looking can?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top