lia41985
New member
We've given some love on the forum to Paula Creamer but it's about time Natalie gets some props:
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yIKStYZWDXY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Her swing is so different than Paula's:
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VyPlK0VcA7g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Really makes me appreciate Brian's recent post:
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yIKStYZWDXY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Her swing is so different than Paula's:
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VyPlK0VcA7g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Really makes me appreciate Brian's recent post:
What I am finding in my research....I am doing research is this:
There seems to be two kinds of golf swings.
Without giving it all away, the Nicklaus-Calcaveccia-Watson-Toms model, and the Sergio-Hogan-McIllroy-Fowler model.
There is "optimum" way to do those two types of swings. And....there is "sub-optimum."
You can make either work, of course, because the ball only knows what the club is doing.
But the body is a HUGE influence.
Last edited: