Jared Willerson
Super Moderator
I am not for them personally, but the only one I have a real problem with is the belly putter. If you don't have the confidence to putt with a real putter, you'll never be that good anyway.
What about anchoring it to the arm??
Ernie Els before 2011: "anchoring a putter to your body is cheating." EE about 2 months ago: using a belly putter.
Maybe we should consider using a Trackman or a video camera an 'unfair advantage'...or a lesson from a good teacher..info from a forum?
Graphite shafts? etc..
Why not just celebrate variations and Man's use of better tools?
I am FOR, of course. Do what it takes to enjoy the game more and play better.
Well shit, let's just play golf on an xbox. Lol
Doesn't bother me either way. There's nothing in the record books that suggest it creates a fundamental advantage. If it did, stigma be damned, guys would flock to it. IMO, there are many critical factors in becoming a good putter before the putter is ever pulled back. The tool and method are just the easiest to see on TV.
I'm simply saying that the PGA win dilutes your assertion that there is (was) nothing in the record books to support an advantage. Mechanically speaking, it is an irrefutable fact that anchoring the lever is more efficient and allows for a more consistently repeatable stroke. Assuming a player can read a green worth a damn, the 'anchored' putter, especially the belly putter, provides an advantage. On the pristine greens on the PGA Tour, all they have to do is get a putt started on line. The anchored putter practically eliminates face angle issues, but I know results are not automatic. A player has to develop the technique required to use it. At the end of the day, putting is all about confidence and feel. But, in my opinion, the anchored putter should not be allowed. If this is too fast, I'm sorry. Maybe you can have someone read it to you.You're saying that constitutes a "fundamental advantage"? One major? Actually, I'm not sure what you're saying. Go slower.
I'm simply saying that the PGA win dilutes your assertion that there is (was) nothing in the record books to support an advantage. Mechanically speaking, it is an irrefutable fact that anchoring the lever is more efficient and allows for a more consistently repeatable stroke. Assuming a player can read a green worth a damn, the 'anchored' putter, especially the belly putter, provides an advantage. On the pristine greens on the PGA Tour, all they have to do is get a putt started on line. The anchored putter practically eliminates face angle issues, but I know results are not automatic. A player has to develop the technique required to use it. At the end of the day, putting is all about confidence and feel. But, in my opinion, the anchored putter should not be allowed. If this is too fast, I'm sorry. Maybe you can have someone read it to you.
What is the opinion of our fellow forum members
For or against putters that are anchored to the players body?
I am against. Specifically the belly putter.
The Adam Scott thread inspired me to ask.