Frans@France
New
steel in driver and hybrid. Added weight to the driver head.
The golfing public has been brainwashed into thinking graphite is better for drivers. And brainwashing in hard to change.
Yep, they certainly are. When I left the UK in 1999, the only Poles in England were the old boys left over from the Home Army in WWII. Now there's a thriving immigrant population. Thing is, before they leave Poland I'm guessing all the lads must have to watch James Bond movies in an attempt to help their assimilation because all the English girls just swoon at their chivalry and impeccable manners - Quite the spectacle apparently.
Anyway, sorry for threadjacking. Back to steel shafts!!![]()
Yo d whats up with the anti gay remark! U think gay men cant play great back then or now?
It's like swinging an axe. I hate light gear.
Dariusz - I have this mental image of you at your course.
There you are, in your white cap and steel spikes, lecturing the juniors on the evils of the modern era. Curious, they follow you to the first tee to see what this "real man golf" is all about, and then you pull out a SMT Deep Bore and an 8 inch tee...
The golfing public has been brainwashed into thinking graphite is better for drivers. And brainwashing in hard to change.
Why?The golfing public has been brainwashed into thinking graphite is better for drivers. And brainwashing in hard to change.
Why?
As a rule, absolutely. Only have to look at the music industry as the starkest example of that. But if steel were better, even by a tiny amount, wouldn't tour pros still be playing it?There only ever is one reason to brainwash the public: it's all about the money, baby.
I only hear this argument from people who hit first into the green. Just saying...![]()
As a rule, absolutely. Only have to look at the music industry as the starkest example of that. But if steel were better, even by a tiny amount, wouldn't tour pros still be playing it?
But if the graphite shaft is easier to fine-tune in the rarified atmosphere of the tour pro world, is it a great leap of faith to backwards- extrapolate, if you like, and say it's also easier to fine-tune graphite across the board, all the way down to the less accomplished player?Probably the ultimate "fine tuned to your swing" graphite shaft is better. But who's in a position to find that shaft from the 1000s of possibilities apart from tour pros?
I'm always skeptical of these posts because...its like the belly putters; people might attach a stigma to them but the pro's have to make putts to make a living, so they don't care if it works. If steel shafted woods, especially for something like a 5 wood, were shorter but much more accurate, wouldn't there'd be more people using them? Especially some of the long hitters who could give up some distance to the field...
But if the graphite shaft is easier to fine-tune in the rarified atmosphere of the tour pro world, is it a great leap of faith to backwards- extrapolate, if you like, and say it's also easier to fine-tune graphite across the board, all the way down to the less accomplished player?
And wouldn't the mere fact that there are 1000's of possibilities in graphite also give it the edge over steel?
I get where dariusz is coming from, maybe he can one day open his own facility and enforce the rules as he sees fit
metal spikes only
steel shafts only, sharp leading edge blades with no bounce
fairways slimmer than dirt roads lined and littered with hazards
slow rugged shaggy greens
carts will be limited to driving in the fairway only to keep the grass from getting too manicured
Part-time players don't have a chance because the don't have the talent (if they did, pound to a penny they'd be a tour player,) not because they can't access top-draw shaft fitting. If they had the talent, they'd be up to their noses in shafts. Catch-22, I guess.Hall of fame post. All 'non fulltime golfer' take note'cause you don't have a chance.