Swing Plane

Status
Not open for further replies.
First of all thanks for the pics!

Wow,
Really? Most are outside the target line? And do they look approximately parallel to the impact shaft line?

The pics have both helped me and made me a little confused (ha ha). I was expecting you to say that it would be incorrect to be pointing outside the target line.



Hank Haney, Leadbetter, and other instructors say parallel to the plane line. Actually, I think they all basically agree that your hands CAN be higher at impact (and that impact is more important than address), so I assumed that if they actually spoke in a little more detail, they would say that it's parallel and above that plane line (ie. the impact plane line).

But, Brian, Denny (I'm not sure who this person is), and others say that it should be pointing at the target line. Could their be a decent explanation to this? Any real life examples (I dunno...rope swinging)? Are most of the Tour players doing this incorrectly then?
 
shin-sha,

Yes, parallel to the impact shaft line. There are some that do point at the target line and share something in common, they work the ball more right to left.

When the shaft points outside the target line, it can go more left thru impact. If it points at or inside the target line, the club works more out thru impact.

I will post some driver pictures to support this when I get a chance.

Redgoat
 
Wouldn't a shaft pointing outside the target line be flatter than the original shaft plane? Shouldn't this in to out swing promote a draw? A steeper shaft should point more in toward the players feet...right?
 
This thread only confirms my worst nightmare about swing plane. Doom to all that tries to control it. (insert laugh here)

I have always tried to get around the swing plane issue by making sure all the other elements were correct and let the plane fall wher eit may be.

Lets look at this link of Els: http://www.golfswing.com/proswings/els.htm

Hands seem to point at ball on downswing(?) His plane seems to be shoulder to ball at the top of ball swing (?) Doesn't seem to be a big plane shift in ds (?) Looks like straight back and up and straight down and through. HELP

Maybe I need to more about the swing plane.
 
quote:Originally posted by Redgoat

shin-sha,

Here is an example of ball flight created by where the shaft is pointing on the downswing.

http://www.hpphoto.com/servlet/LinkPhoto?GUID=515d4594-2764-44cd-6025-59742f9d5808&size=

http://www.hpphoto.com/servlet/LinkPhoto?GUID=7d584aaa-6ef7-611b-5238-28b9489051e9&size=

It is also safe to say that this is not an absolute. The tilt created by these two players is quite different, also contributing to the ballflight.

Redgoat

It is not only safe to say that it is not absolute, it is safe to say that it is irrelevant (IMHO). Whether you draw for fade the ball depends on where your plane line is directed. If it is directed left of the target, you are set up for a pull or a fade. If it is directed right of the target, then push or draw. If the plane line is directed towards the target, then you are set for a ball flight that starts towards the target no matter whether the butt of the club pointed outside, on, or inside the plane line at the start of the downswing.

My 0.02 ...

Jono.
 
quote:Originally posted by shin-sha

OK,
forget about the original shaft plane for a minute.
Let's say the person is steeper than this at impact (just as you say).
But, I think the question is: 1/2 way down the downswing (when the arms are parallel to the ground or a little below that), does the club point to the plane line or is it PARALLEL to the IMPACT shaft plane? And what is the explanation?

That's what I mean, and I think that's the question that Axel (and whoever asks this type of question)is asking.

I know that many instructors use the ORIGINAL SHAFT PLANE as a reference, but they readily admit that impact is steeper than that. They use it as an easy explainable reference.If these same instructors said that the impact shaft plane was steeper, then they would also say that the shaft, 1/2 way down in the backswing, would be parallel to the impact shaft plane.

IMO, both Kelley and Haney are not entirely correct when it comes to the swing plane above waist high. I will talk about why I think this in a second, but let me say here that the most important part of the swing plane is from waist high on the downswing (where the club is horizontal) to waist high on the followthrough (again with the club horizontal). If you can be "on plane" at the bottom of the swing, it doesn't really matter what you look like at the start of the downswing. What you do during the first half of the downswing is to facilitate you to "be on plane" at the bottom of the swing arc (ie. when you release the club). As you read this post (which I fear is going to be pretty long) keep in mind that being on plane at the bottom of the swing arc (where the clubhead speed and thus the centrifugal force is the greatest) is the most important thing.

WARNING: This post is long. If you want to skip the boring bits, scroll down to the end where I have written a summary - the take-home message.

Denny made a good point about the bicycle wheel. Anyone who has experienced the sensation when trying to move a spinning bicycle wheel knows what happens when you try to change the plane of rotation (i.e. change the axis of rotation). The bicycle wheel seems to have a mind of its own. The faster it is spinning and the faster you try to shift the spinning axis, the more it will fight you. Can you say gyroscope? :) This is why you need to keep the club close as possible to a single plane at the bottom of the swing arc (ie. when the clubhead speed is the greatest)

Also, when you twirl a weight at the end of the rope, and you try to move the plane of rotation, the rope will NOT stay parallel to the original plane. The faster you shft the plane, more unstable the rope will become.

IF we were to compare the golf swing to a spinning bicycle wheel or a weight at the end of the string, then ANY plane shift becomes inherently unstable. We should all be swinging like Iron Byron (i.e. on a single plane with NO plane shift). However, this is CLEARLY not the case in good players. No good player that I've seen keeps the shaft on a single plane throughout the swing. There is definitely a plane shift. Why is this?

First let me say why plane shift is ALLOWED. At the start of the downswing, things are moving slowly. The bicycle wheel is spinning slowly. Thus the resistence of plane shift is less. If things were moving faster at the top half of the downswing, then shifting planes will become much more difficult and unstable. Slow angular velocity at the start of the downswing allows plane shift to occur.

Now, left me address why the plane shift is NEEDED. The answer lies in the human anatomy. This confusion over where the butt of the club should point at the start of the downswing is the result of poor understanding of how the arms and the hands move during the golf swing. The golf swing has been compared to the two lever system, there the left arm is the upper lever and the club is the lower lever (for the right hander). In my opinion, this is a poor model that does more harm than good in teaching the golf swing. This incorrectly portrays the left arm as the governor of the swing plane. IF YOU SWING WITH TWO HANDS ON THE CLUB, YOUR TRAIL SIDE IS IN A BETTER POSITION TO CONTROL THE SWING PLANE, ESPECIALLY THROUGH THE IMPACT AREA WHERE IT MATTERS MOST.

Homer Kelley was the first person that I heard mention the importance of the trail side controlling the swing plane. He mentions the importance of the right elbow and the right forearm and gives the example of the javelin thrower who directs the plane of the throw with the right forearm. If the plane of the right forearm wobbled as the javeling thrower lets the javelin go, that thing can go anywhere.

In the pros, you can see how the right forearm and the club swing close to a common plane through the impact zone. Hoever, you can also see that you CAN NOT KEEP the right forearm and the club on the same plane throughout the downswing. This is because the right elbow, which can only hinge in one direction (ie. one degree of freedom), hinges on a different plane to the right forearm-club plane. The right forearm and the club can not even stay on a common plane from waist high on the downswing to impact. However, for learning purposes, it is OK to try to FEEL the right forearm and the club on a common plane from waist high to impact.

The camp that stresses the importance of the trail side the most is the Single Axis camp (ie. Lever Power golf, IMA, Natural Golf, etc). They advise a right hand palm grip so that the right forearm lever, right hand lever, and the club lever can work as closely as possible to a single plane through the impact area. Traditional right hand finger grip does not allow the right HAND to work on a common plane to the right forearm and the club.

Jack Kuykendall (inventor of Single Axis) goes on to compare the golf swing to a NINE lever model, consisting of:
1) left shoulder (ie. neck to left shoulder)
2) right shoulder
3) left arm
4) right arm
5) left forearm
6) right forearm
7) left hand
8) right hand
9) club

This is the most correct GEOMETRIC model that I've seen. You can see that the first 8 levers form a closed circle (or a loop) with the left hand and the right hand fixed on the club. This limits the number of ways these levers can move. The left arm movement is limited by the right hand being on the club and vice versa. Furthermore, the nature of the hinging available at the joints also limit the ways you can move these nine levers. E.g. the elbow joint has only one degree of freedom whereas the shoulder joint is a ball and socket joint with (theoretically) infinite degrees of freedom.

Hmmm ... I think this post is getting too long and probably boring, so let me quickly get to the point.

a) Golf swing is a two handed swing.
b) Left side movement is limited by the right hand being on the club, and the right side movement is limited by the left hand being on the club. Therefore, neither side can be totally dominant in the swing.
c) That being said, the TRAIL side is in a better position to control the swing plane through the impact area. You will see a lot of good players with the right forearm and the club on the same (or close to same) plane through impact.

Let me quickly expand on point c). From waist high on the downswing (ie. where the club is horizontal) to impact, there is approximately 90 degrees of rotation in the left arm. (This is combined effort of left forearm supination, left shoulder external rotation, and small amount of body pivot). However, there is only approximately 30 degrees of rotation required in the right arm. Now, NEITHER the left forearm nor the right forearm are in line with the club at impact in 3 DIMENSIONAL SPACE. Left forearm is not in line with the club if you look from down the line view, and the right forearm is not in line with the club is you look from the front view. Therefore, the side that requires less rotation has better control of the plane of clubhead movement. Try getting a screw driver and bend your wrist so that the forearm and the screw driver are NOT in line with each other. Try using the screw driver like this. You'll find it very difficult as the tip of the screw driver will wobble (because the screw driver lever and the forearm lever are out of line). The side that has less wobble through impact is in a better position to control the clubhead (ie. the trail side)

Because I believe that the trail side is the better controller and supporter of the clubhead (not the club FACE ... which is another topic) through impact, I want to feel the clubhead LAG at the start of the downswing with my trail hand (i.e. right hand). I want to feel the right wrist retaining its bend as I swing down. I want to feel the angle between the club and the right forearm as I start down, not the angle between the left forearm and the club. The way I do this is with a Swingyde. If you set it as per the instructions in the package, then you are monitoring the left forearm-club angle. I set it lower down the club (approx 1 to 2 inches below the grip) and rotated approx 60 degrees clockwise. So, if the leading edge of the club is at 12 o'clock, then I set the Swingyde at 2 o'clock. This way, the Swingyde will slot onto my right forearm at the top of the swing (and I can monitor the right forearm-club angle). I do very slow movements from the top, down to waist high and KEEP the Swingyde ON the right forearm. This is not a dynamic lag (ie. using inertia to enhance lag), but an artifical lag (ie. using muscle to keep the angle). However, it shows me the geometry required. If I look at the mirror from behind the line view, I see that the butt of the club is pointing OUTSIDE the plane line as I start down. You can see this in many pros. I suspect this is why Haney came up with the "parallel to shaft plane" model. ( http://www.golf-tips.info/forumdyna/ebene.mpg ) It LOOKS like the shaft is parallel to the shaft plane, but there is no goemetrical or physical basis for this. Lagging the club against the right forearm as you start down will naturally point the butt of the club outside the plane line that may LOOK parallel to the shaft plane at impact.

Sorry for such a long post.

Jono.

MAIN TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Don't get too anal about where the butt of the club is pointing as you start down. Work on the swing plane from waist high on the downswing to waist high on the followthrough. You can do this with little slow mini swings. FEEL the trail forearm controlling the direction of the clubhead movement (i.e. swing plane) through the impact zone. Build your swing on that by gradually lengthing the backswing and increasing the tempo, checking that you move through the same waist high position on the way down and same waist high position on the way through.
 
Jono,

"It is not only safe to say that it is not absolute, it is safe to say that it is irrelevant (IMHO)."

While I respect your opinion, I don't agree. For clarification, am I correct in my interpretation of your post that waist high to waist high is all that matters? It seems to me that what happens before that may have an influence on the swing(IMHO).

Forgive me if I read your post incorrectly, I got lost somewhere between the gyroscope, Kuykendall, and the advertisement for the Swingyde.;)

Redgoat
 

cdog

New
I agree, waist high to waist high is what matters most, what you do before that is important to allow you to get to waist high in a position to swing on plane.
 
quote:Originally posted by Redgoat

Jono,

"It is not only safe to say that it is not absolute, it is safe to say that it is irrelevant (IMHO)."

While I respect your opinion, I don't agree. For clarification, am I correct in my interpretation of your post that waist high to waist high is all that matters? It seems to me that what happens before that may have an influence on the swing(IMHO).

Forgive me if I read your post incorrectly, I got lost somewhere between the gyroscope, Kuykendall, and the advertisement for the Swingyde.;)

Redgoat

Redgoat,

Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "irrelevant". "Less important" would have been better.

I know my post above was long winded and difficult to follow without diagrams, but when you get some time, print it out and read it at your leisure. You may not agree with everything I say, but if you understand what I am trying to say, you'll see that it's more than just an informercial for the Swingyde. :)

What matters most is how the club stays on plane below waist high. i.e. when the clubhead is below the hands. If you can keep the club "on plane" through this area (when the clubhead speed, and thus the centrifugal force, is the greatest) then your swing is effectively "on plane". From top of the backswing to waist high position on the way down, people have variations depending on the length of the backswing and also HOW they use the nine levers I talked about. Haney's parallel plane theory, while it sounds neat and simple, has no anatomical or geometrical basis. It sounds like a theory he came up with looking at downswing photos instead of trying to analyze the geometry of the human machine. The Swingyde, used my way as described in the post above (not the way the manufactures tell you to use it), shows the importance of the angle between the right forearm and the club. This is NOT on the same plane as the wedge angle that Homer talks about. It lies on a plane that is somewhere BETWEEN the two "flying wedges". I'll see if I can come up with some diagrams or photos later.

Cheers,

Jono.

PS. Just to clarify: I am not saying how the club moves from top of the backswing to waist high position is not important. It's VERY important. If you "lose" the club as you start down, then you are likely to hit a bad shot. You must build a CONSISTENT transition move that will REPEATEDLY get you to the waist high position where you can deliver the clubhead to the ball without compensations. What I AM saying is that with the low clubhead speed during the initial phase of the downswing, you can have individual variations. Some golfer's shaft point inside the plane line, some point outside it, some point at it. Some do ALL of the above during the downswing. Many pros have the shaft pointing INSIDE the plane line as they start down and then OUTSIDE it as they approach waist high position. This is why I feel that laser devices attached at the butt of the club is not very useful.
 
Jono, I have always enjoyed and learned from your posts (I read the SA forum as well as others but rarely post), and am still waiting for your</u> instructional site. I am a true novice so I may be totally off base with these observations, but I wanted to ask a few things about your "plane" model. It seems that when a line is drawn on 2 dimensional photo of 3-dimensional concept, such as swing plane, the result can be misleading. What I mean is this, if you were to attach a laser at the butt end of the shaft of your downswing model, I think that the light would be pointing on a point on the line extending from the ball to the target (or where the golfer is aiming which, I would guess, varys depending on the type of shot shape the golfer is going for) even though, in 2 dimensions, a line drawn in line with the shaft will appear to point elsewhere. The only illustration I can find of this is here:

http://chuckevansgolf.com/media/plane_drill.avi

This is a drill where Evans shows how to use a flashlight to stay on plane. If you pause the video somewhere in the downswing it appears that the club is not on the same plan as impact but the light shows that it is on plane with the target line extending from the ball in both directions.

I hope this makes sense, it is hard to describe these things without good visuals.

Am I way off base?

Thanks
 
quote:Originally posted by wcalem

Jono, I have always enjoyed and learned from your posts (I read the SA forum as well as others but rarely post), and am still waiting for your</u> instructional site. I am a true novice so I may be totally off base with these observations, but I wanted to ask a few things about your "plane" model. It seems that when a line is drawn on 2 dimensional photo of 3-dimensional concept, such as swing plane, the result can be misleading. What I mean is this, if you were to attach a laser at the butt end of the shaft of your downswing model, I think that the light would be pointing on a point on the line extending from the ball to the target (or where the golfer is aiming which, I would guess, varys depending on the type of shot shape the golfer is going for) even though, in 2 dimensions, a line drawn in line with the shaft will appear to point elsewhere. The only illustration I can find of this is here:

http://chuckevansgolf.com/media/plane_drill.avi

This is a drill where Evans shows how to use a flashlight to stay on plane. If you pause the video somewhere in the downswing it appears that the club is not on the same plan as impact but the light shows that it is on plane with the target line extending from the ball in both directions.

I hope this makes sense, it is hard to describe these things without good visuals.

Am I way off base?

Thanks


No you are not way off base. :) Kelley's swing plane model (ie. having the part of the club, whether it be the butt of the club or the hosel end, pointing somewhere ON the target line throughout the golf swing, is a good place to start. It's just not 100% accurate when it comes to what actually happens during the golf swing. However, I have nothing against practising this with laser in SLOW MOTION. I personally don't worry about where the butt of the club is pointing as I start down and concentrate on practising getting into the correct waist high position in the downswing where the club is horizontal and the butt of the club is pointing at the target. (I personally work on a slightly in to out swing, approx 5 degrees, so I work on getting the butt of the club pointing slightly to the right of the target at this point). If you can repeatedly get to a good waist high position on the way down, then you can hit as hard as you want through the impact area and you'll be on plane through impact.

The effect you see (ie. the butt of the club pointing inside then flattening out to point outside the plane line) is not due to 3D nature of the image. If Evans swung the club at his normal speed and had laser at the butt of the club, and we could somehow record the path of the laser beam that fell on the ground, I can assure you that it would not follow the plane line. David Leadbetter's laser device actually has you tracing a curved line with the laser beam on the ground, starting inside the plane line, then outside it.

As you my website, I'm working on it. Remember, I am not a teaching professional, so whatever I present will be to share my thoughts only, not to teach others.

Cheers,

Jono.
 
Have a look at this laser product from David Leadbetter.

http://www.tpgolf.com.au/australia/categories.asp?cID=40

See the yellow line on the ground which the laser beam is supposed to trace? It is curved. It starts INSIDE the plane line, crosses it, and goes OUTSIDE it. Is the path traced in Leadbetter's laser device absolutely correct? Of course not. As I said, there are allowable variations at the start of the downswing. However, it does illustrate how Mr Leadbetter recognises that neither Haney's plane model nor Kelley's model is 100% correct.
 

Brian Manzella

Administrator
I have watched this thread develop.

WoW!

I have been inspired by this to do an article on this topic.

There is much info above that is misleading and some downright wrong.

I will post comments soon...
 

dude

New
quote:Originally posted by brianman

I have watched this thread develop.

WoW!

I have been inspired by this to do an article on this topic.

There is much info above that is misleading and some downright wrong.

I will post comments soon...

Thank goodness!!!! I cannot take this much longer!!!! LOL!! :);)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top