Niblick, first, notice that I'm NOT saying that food type doesn't matter. I'm just saying sometimes people loose perspective of their total calories.
No doubt true.
Assuming calories are equal, some foods makes us feel fuller faster therefore we are less inclined to go munch on other foods.
Put another way, for people with insulin regulation issues and a decent amount of fat, avoiding carbs from diet almost entirely removes hunger as an issue.
Think about it another way. I totally agree with Taubes that there are good calories and bad calories. So low glycemic carbs are better than higher ones.
Agreed. No doubt low glycemic carbs have less of an effect on insulin, thus less of an effect on fat storage. The more complex and lower glycemic index the carbs the more of them you can eat before you start to store fat.
Does that mean you can loose weight by eating 5 slices of wholemeal bread rather than 1 slice of white bread?
Nope, I agree, if the glycemic load of the wheat bread exceeds the load of 1 slice of white bread, it is worse for those with insulin issues.
Or a 30oz steak rather than a piece of white bread with some jam? I don't think so - and yet there are people out there who are cheating themselves by thinking they can!
Actually, this is the part people misunderstand about insulin and fat regulation. It is, as Taubes calls it, Endocrinology 101. 2000 calories of Wonder bread, Coke and potato chips will make some people fat while 2000 calories containing no, or almost no carbohydrates, will allow many of those same people to lose weight. For thin people with no insulin regulation issue the short-term, one day effect of both diets on fat storage may be exactly the same (not talking about long-term effects).
So bottom line: first look at your total calories, then start to consider where those calories are coming from.
No doubt true. No doubt complex carbs better at least in part because of the lessened insulin effect - the effective carb gram impact is less.
If you just consider where you calories are coming and eat like it's the end of the world, then from my experience you will not loose fat.
The odd thing is that for those with insulin and body fat issues, if they keep carbohydates low, most will not want to eat like it's the end of the world, but some of those who do eat quite a decent amount of calories will lose weight as long as total carb grams are very low (now there may well be other health effects that could be problems, but I am talking about fat as the issue).
The reason is that for many people who have decent sized fat stores and insulin level issues, is that carbs effect insulin, which regulates fat storage and fat burning. Fat storage and fat burning are not regulated by fat and protein intake (which has almost no direct insulin effect) but by carbohydrate intake. This is why all calories are not equal - in some people, especially those with certain genetic pre-dispositions and with a decent amount of body fat. You can't just add up the calories.
Leo (is that right?), buy the Taubes book. If you read the whole book and end up thinking it was just junk or a waste of time, email me and I will send you a check for the cost of the book.
This link discusses some of the pre-book furor and Taubes background and other articles:
http://web.mit.edu/knight-science/fellows/interviews/taubes.html
And, by the way, to everyone out there I promise not another non-golf related post in 2008 and I apologize to anyone for my being overly-defensive in this thread. Don't give up on teaching me about golf in my golf threads! (and I really do love the picture of the pound of bacon in this thread...)