Let's pull the gloves off right now...
I started teaching in 1982.
I knew NOTHING about swinging right or left. I thought you just swung the club on a plane. Period.
When I went to see Ben Doyle in 1987, he taught me to look at, and direct my right forefinger, at the "inside-aft" quadrant of the ball.
When I hit the shot I talk about in "Never Hook Again 2" at Royal Golf Club, I had gotten BOTH my plane line & my path
(at the time I thought they were the same thing) way, way,
WAY too far inside-out.
Like, probably about 10°.
With my Ping Eye2 1-iron, a 2° open clubface, and a 10° inside-out plane line, so maybe 13 or 14° inside-out RESULTANT path, I hit a shot in the friggin' sweetspot that didn't get airborne.
Ask Michael Jacobs for his similar story.
So I accidentally learned to swing to the left more. (For the whole story, buy the video
).
My path, measured on a GolfTek machine that measures almost the resultant path, went from 8° inside-out with a 6-iron, to 0° square path.
I got 5 shots around better almost overnight, and in the next 18 months I broke every personal best on courses I had played for 22 years.
The funny path about this revelation was figuring out that the pattern that worked for me, was much like that of David Toms' original swing that he had as youngster, the one I had stupidly tried to teach him away from from 1988-1993.
Luckily, in 1997, I got to teach it back to him. (All of that is in the video)
So what?
So I learned to train my eyes to see a "straight path."
It made me a lot of money, and a lot of good students.
When I learned about the D-Plane, which shows how the club
MUST BE SWUNG TO THE LEFT to hit the ball straight, I had to laugh.
Why did I laugh?
Because I knew I was correct about how far to the left, "Swinging Left" was.
It was left!!!!
And all of the goofy TGM book literalists, who MADE FUN OF ME for talking about swinging left, who said I was wrong, who got up at the seminar with the stupid putter and bought Trackman hoping to SHUT ME UP, lost and lost 100 to nothing.
They were wrong, and they are wrong.
I was correct.
The little man in my pic by the easel is drawing the STUPID "geometry of the circle, book-literalist style.
They draw this little circle, about as big as a G.I. Joe swinging a club, and they draw the forward lean of the shaft hitting the ball on the way to low point.
And they draw impact WAY, WAY, WAY!!! too far back on the plane and in the circle.
They suggest that the golfer MUST keep going WAY WAY WAY DOWN and WAY WAY WAY OUT down the plane post impact.
Bullturds!!!
The stupid resultant divot from the GROSSLY EXAGGERATED impact vs. low point drawing, would be the size of a half-gallon of Blue Bell Ice Cream, and the RESULTANT PATH from a plane line pointed at the target would be 11° or so inside out!!!!!
There is a goofy device trying to get poor folks to do this GROSS EXAGGERATION!!!
This all stops today!!!
Here are the takeaway points from all of my brilliant commentary ,
1. If you go rent PING MAN 5 or IRON BYRON, and have them hit a 6-iron a couple of degrees on the way down like the folks on the PGA Tour,
YOU HAVE TO AIM THE GOLF ROBOT TO THE LEFT!!!!
SO THAT THE GOLF ROBOT SWINGS TO THE LEFT!!!
THE ACTUAL LEFT.
TO HIT THE BALL STRAIGHT.
Is that not "Swinging left"????
2. If you go rent PING MAN5 or IRON BYRON, and have them hit a 6-iron a couple of degrees on the way down like the folks on the PGA Tour,
and you aim them straight
so that the robot "swings straight"
The divot that the robot would take off the watered bentgrass fairways at Vallhalla GC, would be about the size of an elongated Burger King beef patty.
Not a gallon of Blue Bell Homestyle Vanilla!
And the clubhead would get to low point a scant couple of inches forward of the ball,
and the CLUB WOULD SWING LEFT OF THE TARGET LINE AS IT STAYED ON PLANE.
Of course the ball can't fly straight, but could mini-hook at the flag.
and...
THE SECOND HALF OF THE DIVOT, THE HALF PAST LOW POINT (THE LOWEST SPOT IN THE DIVOT)
WOULD CURL LEFT BECAUSE THE CLUB WOULD BE GOING LEFT!!!!
Is that not "Swinging left"????
If you sell PCs, you service PCs and deal with PC customers who want to stay PC customers, or have to stay PC customers.
The PC customers that get mad as hell and want to quit using computers, are the ones that wind up at the APPLE STORE or with an APPLE tech-guy, and ALL the horror stories.
Me and Mike Jacobs have seen all the poor folks who thought they were supposed to keep swinging WAY OUT, and WAY DOWN post-impact.
They can't get a 3-wood airborne!!!
This is NOT a "personal" thing, it is a SCIENTIFICALLY CORRECT thing.
And this time, as it was many times before, I am on the side of correct.
BTW, at least one of the multiple centers—the left shoulder—is in motion, a lot of motion, during the REAL GEOMETRY approaching impact, and past the ball.
So the whole stupid thing is wrong anyway.
If Drs.Mandrin, Zick, and Wood watched that "easel talk" and they were asked this question:
"How scientifically correct was that presentation?"
They would need a couple of DAYS to explain how NON-SCIENTIFIC it was.