drewyallop
New
Remember, you used to BE the Browns. Can't think of anything worse. The post season flops came with them from the lake
Don Cockroft. I still haven't got over it.
Remember, you used to BE the Browns. Can't think of anything worse. The post season flops came with them from the lake
So how does this relate to across the line swings? What needs to be done to make it work? Doesn't the laying down the shaft happen a little more gradually? Whenever I try to lay it off at transition I feel like I loose track of the clubhead and panic and yank it down from the top.
I like Lindsey's idea for this thread to show other ways to make the tumble happen. I think we've seen pretty exaustive examples of the Sergio/Fowler/Hogan type model, and I'm not interested in chasing that look because I don't think it'll ever happen. It'd be nice to see discussed how tumbling relates to other swing models.
Not quite.
"A judge Monday approved a deal allowing Baltimore Ravens linebacker Ray Lewis to avoid murder charges and jail time by pleading guilty to a misdemeanor and testifying against two co-defendants."
Is that where the "Ratbird" moniker came from?
You shouldn't be across the line in the first place.It takes tremendous ability to play consistent golf doing it.Even tour players consider it undesirable.Jack Nicklaus had a tendency to get across the line and it's something he tries not to do.
Like I just said in the case of Jones,if you can make the necessary re-route in the transition then you can be across the line as much as you like.It's not in itself a fault in my opinion.Most however cannot do the transition required to match this position at the top.I don't think you can blame bad ball striking on all on across the line itself...in Ryo's case seems like he tugs and handle drags quite a bit...
I think its interesting that, according to Frank Nobilo, Ian Poulter spent part of the year trying to get his club "less laid off" and more "down the line" because it would be "more correct." The result? He hit it much worse when the club looked more correct. He finally went back to laying it off.
We've discussed the benefits of laying the shaft down in transition so the club head can go out toward the ball. He clearly does that beautifully from a laid off position. Not sure why he tried for a more traditionally orthodox looking backswing, other than he clearly cares, a lot, about how he looks.
Is there any science behind a club that is "perfectly" down the line at the top of the swing?
Just as a matter of interest, would you guys have anything at all against a laid off position at the top?
For me, it's a matter of how the club reaches any position. If you're under turned (pivot) and simply lifted your arms and cupped your lead wrist to get it laid off then that doesn't work (usually) either. Anyone can lay it off, but doing properly is the gig.
I think its interesting that, according to Frank Nobilo, Ian Poulter spent part of the year trying to get his club "less laid off" and more "down the line" because it would be "more correct." The result? He hit it much worse when the club looked more correct. He finally went back to laying it off.
We've discussed the benefits of laying the shaft down in transition so the club head can go out toward the ball. He clearly does that beautifully from a laid off position. Not sure why he tried for a more traditionally orthodox looking backswing, other than he clearly cares, a lot, about how he looks.
Is there any science behind a club that is "perfectly" down the line at the top of the swing?