mgranato
New
I'm thinking more along the competitor lines, like FS being more feasible a reason to show/explain the error margins and explain differing ball flights. "They" have no market share.
Pretty correct in your thinking and your application of common sense to the reason behind the newsletter. But as you can imagine, "they" have a massive problem with my earlier state because someone "heard from people who work closely with the company" (not at the company) that "they" are the reason.
In a small little group (myself, 4 other people, 3 being high profile teaching professionals) on the show floor, Fredrik Tuxen was asked point blank if "they" had anything to do with the newsletter. Without hesitation, he said absolutely not and then went into even more detail about what was covered in the newsletter and why it was written.
Trackman deals with every major OEM's R&D departments, deals with the PGA Tour with their data collection, deals with over 80 touring professionals, deals with several of the top independent researchers and teaching professionals across the globe, and deals with new developments from their competitors... yet somehow "they" feel like they have an effect on company strategy and product development???? Alrighty then.
But please, reserve the right to not believe me (who was there), the person who asked the question (who was there), or the writer of the newsletter/inventor of the product. I'm sure the sources close to the company have the real inside scoop to what really happened.
Last edited: