johnnymarlboro
New
Nice find Dariusz! I've never seen that video of Couples before.
I just don't agree with this, and I dont believe that Dustin Johnson for example, or David Toms, swings that I am very partial too are not allowing their wrist not to bend through impact by imparting negative torque on the wrist. I believe both have excelent pivots and great body rotation and just rotate through the shot.
Huh? "not allowing their wrist not to bend". I may be wrong but doesn't the double negative mean that you are saying that they are allowing their wrists to bend by imparting negative torque?
A teaching acquaintance of mine played some college golf with Couples, says he was just as fluid and still smoked it by everyone back in the day with 1 irons and visually had the same type of swing he does now. he's an ultimate feel player.
Who thinks this?
Kevin,
What is your opinion of Luke Donald's swing with the driver? Smooth, pretty and efficient?
Just absolutely wrong.
Dead wrong
I think you and others new what I mean.
Why do you post such things ? It's kinda silly, sorry.
No doubt that aging would affect negatively possibilities of performing pure push release. Does it mean that aged people should not play golf at all because an author of some naive book did not prepare place for certain release procedures ?
Here you both are, BTW. Observe young Couples and his lead wrist flexing just after separation WITH ALL DAMNED CLUBS:
Enough of me in the subject.
Cheers
The Internet is wearing me out. I've never seen so many thirty something Internet stars with all these these certifications and book knowledge.
There are certainly ball strikers that are better than others out there. So the old "they all can hit it out there, it's only putting" saying is only partially true. But, these are the best players in the world. Even Brad Faxon, who was generally regarded as one of the least capable ball strikers out there, could still hit it on a tour like level.
Nice find Dariusz! I've never seen that video of Couples before.
Hey D I just added this vid to my favorites, thank you
This is actually a very interesting statement and, if I may, I will have a question to you, Kev. Since I never played or never will play on that level, I read a lot and heard lots of stories about very good tee-to-green ballstrikers who couldn't putt (starting from Moe and Knudson ending on probably at least one of your golfing friends of your level) and, as a result, they either couldn't succeed or even qualify to the tour. Surely their ballstriking were superior not only to Faxon but to majority of tour players, yet such great putting Faxons stay on tour and not them. I seem to understand now why almost all great ballstrikers hated putting and regarded it is completely unfair to favourize this part of the game in overall scores.
So, is it really true that even the worst ballstriker on tour can be labelled to have a tour-like tee-to-green game ?
Cheers
This is actually a very interesting statement and, if I may, I will have a question to you, Kev. Since I never played or never will play on that level, I read a lot and heard lots of stories about very good tee-to-green ballstrikers who couldn't putt (starting from Moe and Knudson ending on probably at least one of your golfing friends of your level) and, as a result, they either couldn't succeed or even qualify to the tour. Surely their ballstriking were superior not only to Faxon but to majority of tour players, yet such great putting Faxons stay on tour and not them. I seem to understand now why almost all great ballstrikers hated putting and regarded it is completely unfair to favourize this part of the game in overall scores.
So, is it really true that even the worst ballstriker on tour can be labelled to have a tour-like tee-to-green game ?
Cheers