I'll guess at it if you'd like Wulsy...
For sure!
I'll guess at it if you'd like Wulsy...
Actually I use them side by side from beginning. I meant that I put more attention to the body movements first but of course check also how the club is acting and ball starts. Just a line in the water
So LM owners loose their sense of feel? By definition those who guess must hone theirs? Can't really see that one bud, I'd have thought it was the other way round.
Wulsy,
I will go create the shot tomorrow and repot back.
I did some math and I came up with some really goofy numbers for that shot.
I'd rather not guess—I don't have to. I own a machine.
I do believe that TM algorithms are advanced enough to give very accurate face angle info. But why not measure, or try to measure, the GE aspect too? It is, after all, the only thing that seriously effects ball flight which is not being measured.
Sorry Todd.
That won't work either.
Measurement will NEVER WORK on ANY FACE not pointing in exactly the same direction as the PATH with any back of face CofG.
GEAR EFFECT.
GEAR EFFECT.
I pay more attention into what the club does.
So does the ball.
Frans, I'm not asking for a definitive answer on what the impact parameters in this shot WERE. Just what they COULD HAVE BEEN. The shot exists, no?
My clubs do nothing. I have to move them myself. I think I better buy new ones if they do
My clubs do nothing. I have to move them myself. I think I better buy new ones if they do
How do you know what to do with them without impact feedback? Why not just swing and not hit balls at all!
There is more then one shot that will generate that ball flights specially because the only data you are providing is straigth at the start and then 20 yards hook.
A spin axis of 10degree will give 7% side deviation : so 200 yards carry with 10D will curve 14 yards.
So I can already give you a infinite number of spin axis values/ carry combination that will result in 20 yards hook.
Why don't you read Brian's posts!!!! It's impact backwards, not swing forwards! You're the only one here who asserts swing first impact second.
175yard carry, flies higher than average for the 35* loft, blade, ch speed 90mph, not big banana hook, more of a gradual curve.
I'd happily settle for 3 possibilities.
I'm not sure what anyone is advocating or not, but I find it hard to believe that anybody would go in any other order than what the ball is doing, what the club is doing, and then what the body is doing.