Kevin Shields
Super Moderator
Less than a full shoulder turn? Strengthen your grip, bow your left wrist or play a fade.
i think Tiger does a pretty good job of using #4
i think Tiger does a pretty good job of using #4
This has been a great thread. With some great posts from Kevin and Lindsey. I have some observations and a few questions that will hopefully lead to additional posts.
1. Verticle left arm.
Garcia, Fowler and Kuchar all turn their shoulders more than 90 degrees in the backswing. This ensures that the 1st move down with their shoulders is lower and out towards the ball. This would seem to be a huge advantage in getting to that “Verticle’ left arm position at last parallel point. Most players begin the downswing with the left shoulder moving back and up. Any recommendations for players with less than 90 degrees of shoulder turn?
2. Level shoulders, Arm position at top of backswing, #4 accumulator.
Kevin mentions “Level” shoulders at last parallel. Both Garcia and Fowler keep their right arm in front of them at the top of the backswing and don’t get their left arm across their chest. It would seem that to get to last parallel with level shoulders, the left arm has to be quite a bit off the chest. Jim Furyk with less shoulder turn has the left arm across the chest at the top of the backswing and all the way to impact. He also has a much higher left shoulder at last parallel. (He also has one more major and soon to be player of the year awards than these other two guys. I can’t believe he’s not playing tomorrow morning.)
Questions:
Should players with shoulder turns smaller than Garcia and Fowler, swing their arms farther in the backswing or more across the chest.
Is Jim Furyk minimizing #4 accumulator keeping his left arm tight to his chest? Who is a tour example of someone that maximizes #4?
I look forward to all your responses, and apologize if it’s already been covered.
Could you explain "Backed up" shaft? Thanks.
Apparently I've been under plane, with an open face since the Reagan administration. It would seem that a late #3 accumulator roll would make consistent ball flight difficult. Would this late roll also cause the club to move even more inside out?
Not that im aware of
Apparently I've been under plane, with an open face since the Reagan administration. It would seem that a late #3 accumulator roll would make consistent ball flight difficult. Would this late roll also cause the club to move even more inside out?
As opposed to someone under plane with a very strong grip and very little #3
The clubhead will beat the pivot/golfer to the ball and it will either hook or the club just gets stuck in the ground (see Tiger 3 woods). Hard to over tumble without either being very strong, undynamic, or backing the left hip up and getting forward axis tilt.
I was shanking it last night and despite being perfectly on plane at the delivery position I was delivering the hosel to the ball. But dang it I was no longer under plane so the tumble action was working a bit.
I like the idea of the tumble though as a way to keep on plane. I assume though if one comes into the delivery position to high and then tumbles on top of it then its going to produce once heck of a pull or a shank.
If you mean too high as being little axis tilt, then that's what my trouble has been. From the suggestion by Jim, I've been working on the hip turn back and expanding the left side with the left hip bump into the downswing. It seems by doing this, you can tumble and turn around the left leg hard with less a chance of hitting it left.
My problem has been the opposite of yours though, I tend to come over the top.
Axis tilt is a very tricky thing and can mean many different things to many swings.
Do not try to tilt until the shaft is near vertical for the last time pre-impact.