wulsy,
I'm trying to send you a private message but your inbox is full. Would you mind clearing some space? I'd appreciate it.
So what you're saying is that I shouldn't think that's I'm a Ferrari, that I'm actually more of an Accord or Civic, and that when I'm approaching a turn, I shouldn't floor it? You're saying elite drivers don't just floor it? No wonder I pay so much for insurance.
Speaking of driving analogies, this thread was from earlier in the year but provided an awesome analogy that definitely set off a light bulb in my head: http://www.brianmanzella.com/golfing-discussions/17273-motorcycle-countersteering.html
The last guy I posted up was a major championship winner....so is this guy...
The hits just keep on coming.....
What's funny is that the lunatic is making graphs with the x axis being...frame. Yes, he's doing his best to discredit science. Years of graphing time along the x axis falls to the wayside so that this bozo can eek out 15 more minutes of insanity.
It's either turn the pelvis and use that motion to pull on to get the torso turning faster or hold the pelvis stationary and turn the torso around that. Which do you think will generate more turning speed of the torso?
And when you pull on the turning pelvis with the torso, what happens to the pelvis turning speed?
I think the player in question is the Bubbchen flipped. (as someone suggested earlier).
OK, wrong again. Vijay?
It's either turn the pelvis and use that motion to pull on to get the torso turning faster or hold the pelvis stationary and turn the torso around that. Which do you think will generate more turning speed of the torso?
The latter.
Maybe in a shorter range of motion--like on a pitch, chip or putt. But, with all the turning athletic motions in mind, I'll take the first choice.