It's true like Brian says,the ball doesn't know but it's just good technique.It's what most of the best players in the world do.
Here is a slow motion close up of Mickelson.Fast forward to 3:25 and see how flat his left wrist is well into the follow through.
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/woRsFpkzxZQ?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/woRsFpkzxZQ?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Holy clubface rotation, Batman! Phil rolls that sucker 180*, on the inclined plane, from early in the downswing to a few feet post-impact. If that clubface isn't rolling much DURING impact, it sure ain't from a lack of trying!
Holy clubface rotation, Batman! Phil rolls that sucker 180*, on the inclined plane, from early in the downswing to a few feet post-impact. If that clubface isn't rolling much DURING impact, it sure ain't from a lack of trying!
Birly,I think it's an anti-flip move.Once you stop rolling you start flipping.
I think Tigers left wrist is pretty flat where you say it is a little bent.I can argue that Phil is actually a little arched so Tiger just looks bent in comparison.
Does rate of closure make any difference?The face closes just 0.5 degrees during the impact interval.Flippers or reverse rollers are more likely to leave the face open.Hall of fame players who roll are more likely to have the face shut thus the need for them to have a neutral to weak left hand.That would be the only difference in my opinion.
Not through impact.
Sorry Todd.
You guys ought to start LISTENING to us....
Flattening the left wrist is just a way of closing the face. Bending it through impact helps to avoid a shut face with the club coming in too much from the inside (hooks): thats why you see the cupped wrist post-impact so often on tour.
I am confused. In my lesson with Brian, he had me use twistaway at the beginning of the downswing, and to swing to a wedding ring up configuration at follow thru. I perceive this as a rolling action. Is this discussion based on the premise that the clubface is either open, square or closed at impact and not opening or closing, or in other words in the process of one of those movements? If that is the case, what is the point? I understand the interval of impact is much too fast to consciously control. I try to counter that by finishing wedding ring up. Do I disregard that instruction which has been key? I simply do not understand this thread. Brian, is there a practical application of the premise of this thread?
EJ - we can argue about the angle at the back of the left hand, but if you look at the shaft when it's in the corner of the screen, it lines up more with the right arm than the left.
That's beside my point though. The rate of closure that I'm interested in isn't the fraction of a degree whilst ball and club are in contact. It's the rate of closure through what might be called the hitting area. I don't know whether you'd want to define that as a foot or a yard either side of the ball, but the idea is that the amount of clubface rotation through that segment of the swing is linked to the demands of timing a good shot.
I don't know whether flat-wristed rollers rotate the clubface more or less than flippers, or even if there's a link between clubface rotation and shotmaking consistency. Both seem like interesting questions to me, but the answers don't seem at all obvious, given the examples we've both traded.
Since, of the 3 guys you raised, Phil, Tiger and Hogan, only one of them has a reputation for accurate and consistent driving, what, in your view, would be the advantages of not flipping? By flipping, I'm talking about pros here, and not some drop-kicking, sod-laying hacker.
Here's some Snead sequences I put together from 1946.
Photo quality not so great.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP4_Ohpiclg[/media]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMYLExkq1fA[/media]
I think his wrist is bent in the photos just past impact.
I think some golfers, who are told not to flip it get too caught up in the whole flat left wrist idea. I know I did, I wouldn't let that wrist bend for nothing and I kept the right wrist as bent as I could. What I ended up with was a slow speed dive at the ball with a right shoulder that flew out and down....but I kept that right wrist bent and left wrist flat!
I struggled with pulls and blocks, still do a little in fact because I strove so hard to keep this alignment too long.
Learning to "swing" and let the clubhead feel like it overtakes my hands has done wonders for my distance and direction.
Let it play out a little more. I think the 60s and 70s HOFers were heavily influenced by Hogan and supination. Does anybody have post impact photos pre 1955? Would be interesting to see. Most modern players have bend in the left wrist since the game is more about power. Force Across the Shaft overtaking a freewheeling left wrist and spaghetti noodle shaft at impact.
Flattening the left wrist opens and delofts the club. Rolling and bending it closes it.
Brian Manzella said:Negative Left Wrist Torque
I think the action of rolling and delofting is more advantageous during iron play.Like Hogan said,it almost guarantees ball contact and then turf.No science involved here,just good old fashioned emperical evidence.
I don't think you will find many pros who flip badly.Their leading wrist aint gonna bend significantly just after impact like a hacker.Rather than duff,they might hit it a bit heavy or a touch thin which you don't want happening when needing a par for your first major.
Both Phil and Tiger are great iron players.They both spray their drivers but are amongst the longest on tour.It's not really fair comparing this generation with the past.It's a bomb and gauge game now and drivers are longer and lighter.Phil is not the type who would drop 15 yards for the sake of accuracy.