Lindsey Newman
New
I think that something needs to be pointed out when it comes to "tumble". The fact that initially Kevin used Sergio in the name of this incredible thread maybe has created a model. Sergio is an incredible representation of tumble, but so is David Duval and just about every other end of the spectrum of quality ball strikers.
In the end, tumble is about having the shaft work like a shaft, a clubhead like a clubhead and a clubface like a clubface. It has been my experience that almost every poor swing I have seen, including my own at times, works in an opposite fashion to the design of the club. Whether a player uses their pivot to drive the clubhead out to the ball, forearm rotation or optimally a combination, it is of pure preference and this is clearly stated throughout this thread.
The bottom line is roundhouse, horizontal, out, over and warped hand paths negatively affect the shaft angle and squaring ability of the TOTAL club - reverse tumble.
We all want the same thing, pure ball striking with the best ball flight given our prediction of the future at address. Tumble is empirical. Let us get back to the goal and continue the quest.
In the end, tumble is about having the shaft work like a shaft, a clubhead like a clubhead and a clubface like a clubface. It has been my experience that almost every poor swing I have seen, including my own at times, works in an opposite fashion to the design of the club. Whether a player uses their pivot to drive the clubhead out to the ball, forearm rotation or optimally a combination, it is of pure preference and this is clearly stated throughout this thread.
The bottom line is roundhouse, horizontal, out, over and warped hand paths negatively affect the shaft angle and squaring ability of the TOTAL club - reverse tumble.
We all want the same thing, pure ball striking with the best ball flight given our prediction of the future at address. Tumble is empirical. Let us get back to the goal and continue the quest.